Oseman-Dean v. Illinois State Police et al
| Jody Oseman-Dean |
| Harold Nelson, Michael Cooke, Robert Haley, Marc Maton and Illinois State Police |
| 1:2011cv01935 |
| March 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Will |
| Suzanne B. Conlon |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
177
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Geraldine Soat Brown on 3/19/2012: For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to This Court's Order Dated December 19, 2011 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(2) 114 is denied as it relates to the deposition of Marc Maton. This ruling concludes all matters relating to that motion. All matters relating to the referral of this matter having been concluded, the referral is closed and the case is returned to the District Judge. [For further details see minute order.] Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
|
Filing
134
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Geraldine Soat Brown on 1/24/2012: For the reasons set out below, the Non-Party Deponents' Motion for Protective Order 104 is granted in part and denied in part as set out below. Plaintiff's Motio n for Sanctions Pursuant to this Court's Order Dated December 19, 2011 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(2) 114 is denied as it relates to Suzanne Jansky's deposition; it remains pending as it relates to Mark Maton's deposition. The Non-Part y Deponents' Motion to Terminate Deposition 117 is denied, and the Non-Party Deponents' Second Motion for Protective Order 117 is granted in part and denied in part as set out below. [For further details see minute order.] Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
|
Filing
96
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Geraldine Soat Brown on 12/19/2011: The remaining disputes on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 47 are ruled upon as set out below. This concludes all matters regarding that motion. [For further details see minute order.] Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
|
Filing
78
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Geraldine Soat Brown on 11/22/2011: For the reasons set out below, Defendants' Limited Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Discovery Ruling 61 is granted in part as follows: The following add itional limitation is added to the protective order entered on November 1, 2011: Plaintiffs counsel shall hold defendants' answer to Interrogatory 1, and all copies and excerpts thereof, in a locked container in plaintiff's counsel's office, and shall create and maintain a list of all persons who have access to that container. In all other respects, defendants' motion is denied. [For further details see minute order.] Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
