Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Blue Cab Company et al
Cincinnati Insurance Company |
Blue Cab Company and Rose Washington-Sanders |
1:2011cv02055 |
March 25, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Joan H. Lefkow |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 Amended Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 3/31/2015: Sanders' motion for summary judgment 63 is denied. Because the court is persuaded that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to the reasonableness of the set tlement, Sanders' motion to alter or amend the judgment 83 is granted. The Court's previous opinion and order 76 and entry of judgment in favor of Cincinnati 81 are hereby vacated. The court will schedule a trial on the reasonableness of the settlement. The parties are directed to appear for a scheduling conference on April 21, 2015 at 11:00 a.m.Mailed notice(mad, ) |
Filing 78 MOTION by Plaintiff Cincinnati Insurance Company for judgment in its Favor (Nightingale, Hope) |
Filing 76 Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 5/9/2014: Motion of Rose Washington Sanders for summary judgment 63 is denied. In light of the disposition of this motion, Sanders can take nothing on her claim against Cincinnati Insurance Comapny. Therefore, Cincinnati Insurance Company should move promptly for entry of judgment in its favor.Mailed notice(mad, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.