Barker v. A.D. Conner, Inc. et al
| A.D. Conner, Inc. and Heidenreich Trucking Company |
| Joseph A. Barker |
| Teamsters Local 142 |
| 1:2011cv02255 |
| April 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Labor/Management Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 160 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 8/17/2011:; Respondents motion to stay enforcement of the Courts memorandum opinion and order of 7/11/11 pending appeal 92 is denied. Petitioners motion for expedited ruling 98 is stricken as moot. For further details, see below. Notices Mailed by Judge's Staff (tbk, )
|
|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 7/11/2011. Notices Mailed by Judge's Staff (tbk, )
|
|
Filing
62
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 5/11/2011: For the reasons stated below, the hearing on the petition for injunctive relief will be held on 5/13/2011 at 10:00 a.m., as previously scheduled [see 57]. The hearing will proce ed by way of argument of counsel with questions from the Court. Respondents requests for discovery and an evidentiary hearing [see 59, at 26-29] are respectfully denied at this time, subject to the discussion in the last paragraph of this order. For further explanation, please see below. Notices Mailed by Judge's Staff
|
|
Filing
57
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 4/14/2011: For the reasons explained in open court at the April 12 motion hearing, the pending motions are resolved as follows: Respondents motion to stay the case 7 is respectfully den ied; Petitioners motions concerning briefing in this matter [10, 12] are granted in part as explained below; the joint motion of Teamsters Local Unions Nos. 142 and 705 for leave to appear 16 is respectfully denied without prejudice; Petitioners mo tion to quash Respondents discovery requests 18 is granted at this time, but subject to the caveat discussed on the record (and below); and Defendants motions for leave to file oversized briefs [22, 24] are granted. Petitioners brief in support of his motion for preliminary injunction 4 is due on 4/20/2011, Respondents answer to the petition and response to the motion for preliminary injunction are due on 5/4/2011, and Petitioners reply (should he wish to file one) is due on 5/9/2011. Petiti oners and Respondents initial briefs shall each be limited to thirty pages, and Petitioners reply (should there be one) shall be no longer than fifteen pages. Should the Court conclude that discovery and live testimony would not be useful to the disp osition of the motion for preliminary relief, this matter will proceed to hearing on 5/13/2011 at 10:00 a.m. Should the Court permit discovery and request live testimony, it will so advise the parties, set the matter for further status, and reset the hearing to 5/31/2011 at 10:00 a.m. Notices Mailed by Judge's Staff (tbk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
