The Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc. v. Haynes et al
The Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc. and National Football League Management Council |
Michael Haynes, Joe Odom, Cameron Worrell and National Football League Players Association |
Cameron Worrell, Michael Haynes, Joe Odom and National Football League Players Association |
National Football League Management Council and The Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc. |
1:2011cv02668 |
April 21, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Lake |
Elaine E. Bucklo |
Labor/Management Relations |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs National Football League Management Council, The Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc. by Elizabeth A. Kaveny (Kaveny, Elizabeth) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by National Football League Management Council (Kaveny, Elizabeth) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kaveny, Elizabeth) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by The Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc., National Football League Management Council; Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0752-5926541. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)(Kaveny, Elizabeth) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael T. Mason. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.