Davis v. Schwartz et al
| Joseph Davis |
| Gregory Schwartz and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois |
| 1:2011cv02998 |
| May 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Perry |
| Samuel Der-Yeghiayan |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan on 1/24/2012: For reasons stated in the minute order, Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file notarized statement or declaration and brief memorandum 33 is denied. [For further details see minute order.] Mailed notice (ph, )
|
|
Filing
29
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan on 12/15/2011: For the reasons stated below, Petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability is denied. Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 26 is denied as moot. Mailed notice(ph, )
|
|
Filing
24
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan on 11/9/2011: For the reasons stated below, Petitioners petition for a rehearing, which the court will liberally construe as a motion to alter or amend judgment 23 is denied. Petitioners petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum 21 is denied as moot. Mailed notice. [For further details see written opinion.](mr, )
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM Opinion Signed by the Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan on 10/6/2011.(mr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
