Dobbey v. Randle et al
| Lester Dobbey |
| Shaun Bass, Liping Zhang, J. Thomas, I.A. Kissell, Leslie Turner, Margaret Thompson, Mark Hosey, Anthony Ramos, Marcus Hardy, Marvin Reed, Michael Randle, Roger E. Walker, Jr, Dep. Dir. Pierce, Jackie Miller, Latonya Williams, Terry L. McCann and Frank Shaw |
| 1:2011cv03000 |
| May 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Will |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ENTER MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated below, the Court denies Plaintiff's motion for an in camera offer of proof 74 , denies Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 68 , and grants Defendant's motion for summary judgment 63 . Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 9/10/2013. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
7
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 9/8/2011: The Clerk is directed to: (1) file the amended complaint; (2) terminate Defendants Walker, Pierce, McCann, Shaw, Ramos, Hosey, Thomas, Kissell, Thompson, Zhang, and Williams purs uant to the amended complaint and Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a); (3) terminate Defendants Bass, Randle, Miller, and Hardy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; (4) issue summonses for service of the amended complaint on Defendants Reed and Turner by the U.S. Marshal; and (5) send Plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form and Instructions for Submitting Documents along with a copy of this order. Mailed notice (For further details see Written Opinion) (nf, )
|
|
Filing
6
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 9/1/2011: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $ ;25.14 from Plaintiffs account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial filing fee, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at the St ateville Correctional Center. The Court previously had determined that the claim originally filed in No. 10 C 3965 and now refiled in this action was acceptable. However, Plaintiff has now submitted a proposed amended complaint 5 . The Court will undertake its preliminary review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and issue a further order following that review. Mailed notice (For further detail see Written Opinion)(nf, )
|
|
Filing
4
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 5/4/2011: Plaintiffs motion to alter or amend the Court's order of 11/2/2010 28 is denied. Plaintiffs motions requesting that the Court complete § 1915 review of Plaintiffs pro posed second amended complaint [32, 36] are granted. Plaintiff has submitted a second amended complaint containing two acceptable claims, but those claims have been inappropriately joined. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21, the Court severs Count 2 of Plaintiff's complaint and directs the Clerk to open a new case under a new case number. The Clerk is further directed to file Plaintiffs second amended complaint 30 , his IFP application 3 , and this order, in the newly opened case. Plaintiff may pursue Count 2 in the newly opened case, and the Court grants him IFP status in the new case based on the IFP application that he submitted in this case. If Plaintiff proceeds with both cases, he will be responsible for paying the filing fee for both cases. If Plaintiff does not wish to pursue Count 2 as a separate lawsuit, he must notify the Court within 30 days of the date of this order. The Clerk is ordered to issue summonses as to Defendants in this case, as detailed in this order, and the U.S. Marshals Service is directed to serve them. The Clerk is finally directed to send Plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form and Instructions for Submitting Documents along with a copy of this order. Mailed notice(nf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
