Crosby v. Servant et al
Ronald Crosby |
Liakas, Servant and Khan |
1:2011cv04215 |
June 21, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Samuel Der-Yeghiayan |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan on 8/1/2011: As stated below, since Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or filed an accurately and properly completed in forma pauperis application form, this action is dismissed. All pending motions are hereby stricken. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 7 stricken. Civil case terminated (For further detail see written opinion). Mailed notice(smm) |
Filing 5 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan on 7/7/2011: For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is denied. Plaintiff is given until 7/28/11 to either pay the filing fee or fi le an accurately and properly completed in forma pauperis application form. Plaintiff is warned that if he fails to pay the filing fee or file an accurately and properly completed in forma pauperis application form by 7/28/11, This case will be dismissed. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 4 is denied. (For further details see written opinion). Mailed notice(smm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.