Bolden v. Reyes et al
| Darell Wayne Bolden |
| Tom Darts, Salvador Godinez, Daniel Brown, Supt. Reyes and John Mueller |
| 1:2011cv04298 |
| June 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 10/5/2011: Plaintiff's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis 13 is denied. The court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith and orders Plaintiff to pay the appella te filing fee of $455 by October 26, 2011, or the Court of Appeals may dismiss his appeal for want of prosecution. The Clerk is requested to send a copy of this order to the PLRA Attorney, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Mailed notice. [For further details see written opinion.](mr, )
|
|
Filing
6
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 9/6/2011: Plaintiff Darell Wayne Bolden's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 4 is granted. However, this case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim. Bolden's motion for appointment of counsel 5 is denied as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. [For further details see text below.](mr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
