Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC v. Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC
Defendant: Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
Case Number: 1:2011cv04574
Filed: July 6, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Robert W. Gettleman
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 453 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 2/16/2016: For the reasons stated in the accompanying decision, the Court approves defendant's bill of costs in part [dkt. no. 434]. The Court will tax Cascades $55,992.49, plus the recalculated cost of court reporter fees from the September trial. Samsung is to provide the requested recalculation within five days of entry of this order. The remainder of the bill of costs is overruled. (mk)
September 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 418 MOTION by Plaintiff Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC for judgment Cascades' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Validity and Infringement (Niro, Dean)
February 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 229 CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 2/18/2015: The parties' unopposed motion to correct order is granted. The accompanying Corrected Memorandum Opinion and Order contains corrections of certain dates on pages 15 and 16. (mk)
January 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 223 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 1/6/2015: For the reasons stated in the accompanying decision, the Court grants Samsung and HTC's motion for summary judgment of noninfringement in part and denies the motion in part [Case No. 11 C 4574, dkt. nos. 197 & 198; Case No. 11 C 6235. dkt. no. 152]. The cases are set for a status hearing on January 14, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. for the purpose of setting a trial date and addressing whether there should be separate trials for each case. (mk)
September 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 193 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 9/14/2014: For the reasons stated in the accompanying decision, the Court grants defendants' motion for summary judgment in part and denies it in part [dkt. nos. 156 & 156]. This case and Case No. 11 C 6235 remain set for a status hearing on September 30, 2014, but the time of the status hearing is advanced to 9:00 a.m. on that date, and it will be conducted by telephone. Given the number of attorneys involved, counsel are directed to make appropriate arrangements for a call-in number and are to communicate those arrangements to the undersigned judge's chambers at least one business day prior to the call. (mk)
January 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 141 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 1/2/2014: The Court rules on the disputed claim terms as set forth in the accompanying decision. These cases are set for a further status hearing before the undersigned jud ge on January 21, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. The parties are directed to confer prior to that date regarding whether there are additional common issues that might warrant expansion of the IOP 13 pretrial consolidation and are to submit a status report contai ning their positions in this regard by no later than January 17, 2014. The status report should include each party's positions on what, if any, further fact discovery is appropriate under Local Patent Rule 1.3 as well as each party's intentions with regard to the disclosure of expert witnesses. (mk)
July 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 112 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 7/5/2013: Defendants' motions to dismiss are denied for the reasons stated in this decision. Prior to the 7/15/13, counsel are to confer regarding a joint schedule for claim construction in this and the other cases assigned to Judge Kennelly for joint determination of that issue. (mk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC v. Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC
Represented By: Arthur Anthony Gasey
Represented By: Paul Christopher Gibbons
Represented By: Raymond P. Niro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?