Therkield v. City of Chicago
| David R. Therkield |
| City Of Chicago, Nicole Henkes, Nicholas Prazuch and Lonnie Norman |
| 1:2011cv05079 |
| July 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: the Court grants in part Defendants' motion for summary judgment 39 and dismisses Plaintiff's federal false arrest claim (Count I). The Court dismisses without prejudice Plaintiff's state law claims for false imprisonment (Count II), malicious prosecution (Count III), respondeat superior (Count IV), and statutory indemnity (Count V). Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 7/31/2013. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
35
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 10/16/2012: For the reasons set forth below, the Court sua sponte dismisses without prejudice Counts VI and VII pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defend ant Norman is dismissed from this lawsuit. The claims against the City of Chicago and Defendant Officers remain pending in this court. Defendant Normans motion to dismiss 18 is denied as moot. Mailed notice. [For further details see written opinion.] (ea, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
