Magsby v. Teague et al
| Paul Magsby |
| Mark Teague and Maywood Public Defenders Office |
| 1:2011cv05127 |
| July 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| James F. Holderman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 8/2/2011. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file in forma pauperis 6 is granted. The Court authorizes and orders Cook County Jail officials to deduct $14.83 from Plaintiff' s account, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the Supervisor of Inmate Trust Fund Accounts, Cook County Dept. of Corrections Administrative Office, Division V, 2700 S. California, Chicago, IL 60608. However, the complaint is dismissed pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for failure to state an actionable federal claim and lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. The case is t erminated. All other pending motions are denied as moot. This dismissal counts as one of Plaintiff's three allotted dismissals under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). [For further details see written opinion.] Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 08/02/2011. Mailed notice (lw, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
