Garner v. The City of Country Club Hills, Illinois et al
| Michelle Garner |
| John Edwards, Vincent Lockett, Frank Martin, Cynthia Singleton, Leon Williams, The City of Country Club Hills, Illinois, Steven Burris and Anthony Davis |
| 1:2011cv05164 |
| July 29, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
186
ENTER MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Before the Court are motions to amend complaints in two separate cases ( 162 in No. 11- cv-5164, and 120 in No. 11-cv-5766), which have been consolidated for pre-trial proceedings. For the reasons set forth below, both motions are granted. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 12/20/2013. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
107
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Young B. Kim on 8/23/2012: Motion hearing held. Plaintiff's motion to compel 103 is denied without prejudice. Based on the parties' discussion with the court in open court, the parties we re able to reach an agreement to resolve the issues raised in the motion. Plaintiff's motion to compel 104 is granted in part and denied in part as detailed below for the reasons stated in open court. Status hearing held and continued to O ctober 4, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. Defendant City has until September 17, 2012, to comply with the terms of this order. And, as ordered during the last status hearing, Defendant City is directed to provide all information to all parties in the related c ases (11 CV 5164, 11 CV 5551, 11 CV 5766, and 11 CV 8474). To ensure that counsel from each of the related cases receives notices of electronic filings in these cases, the clerk's office is directed to add a "Service List" and link the appropriate attorneys of record in the related cases to the "Service List." Finally, the named individual defendants in this case failed to appear again. (For further details see written opinion.) Mailed notice (ma,)
|
|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 7/23/2012. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
82
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 5/23/2012: For the reasons stated below, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendant's motion for reassignment and consolidation 47 . Pursuant to I.O.P. 13(e), this Cour t recommends that the Executive Committee enter an order (1) directing that the undersigned judge preside over coordinated pre-trial proceedings in Case Nos. 11-CV-5164, 11-CV-5551, 11-CV-5766, and 11-CV-8474 and (2) designating Magistrate Judge Kim to supervise a coordinated discovery process in those four cases. (For further details see text below.) Mailed notice. (psm, )
|
|
Filing
68
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Young B. Kim on 3/23/2012: Motion hearing held. Defendant Country Clubs Hills' motion to compel 54 , in connection with its Interrogatory ## 4, 8 and 11 and Request for Production of Documents ## 1, 2, 4 , 6-15, 17-18, 19, 20-24 and 41-50, is granted in part and denied in part for the reasons stated in open court and as detailed in this order. Plaintiff is ordered to comply with this order by April 6, 2012. All matters relating to the referral of this action having been concluded, the referral is closed and the case is returned to the assigned District Judge. [For further details see minute order.] Mailed notice (aac, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
