Securities And Exchange Commission v. Ferrone et al
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Stephen D. Ferrone, Douglas A. McClain, Sr., Douglas A McClain, Jr., James T. Miceli, Immunosyn Corporation, Argyll Biotechnologies, LLC, Argyll Equities, LLC and Padmore Holdings, Ltd.
Case Number: 1:2011cv05223
Filed: August 1, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Elaine E. Bucklo
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 213 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court orders as follows. (1) Ferrone's Motion in Limine to Exclude as Trial Exhibits Privilege-Asserted Documents Produced after Discove ry Cut-Off [ECF No. 147] is denied. (2) Ferrone's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Concerning McClain, Sr.'s Alleged Separate Fraud on the Texas Clinic Patients [ECF No. 146] is granted. (3) Ferrone's Daubert Motion to Restric t Testimony of Dr. Peter Rheinstein [ECF No. 149] is granted in part, denied in part, and reserved in part. (4) Ferrone's Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Drs. Hazelwood and Kanter [ECF No. 148] is granted in part, denied in part, a nd reserved in part. (5) The SEC's Motion in Limine No. 2 for a Pre-Trial Ruling That the SEC Can Introduce into Evidence Two Documents Notwithstanding Flawed Privilege Claims [ECF No. 142] is granted. (6) The SEC's Motion in Limine No. 3 to Preclude Ferrone from Offering Evidence or Argument about Investor Reliance [ECF No. 144] is granted in part and denied in part. (7) The SEC's Motion in Limine No. 1 to Preclude Defendant from Offering Evidence of or Argument at Trial That He Reasonably Relied on Advice of Counsel Or the Involvement of Lawyers Or Other Professionals [ECF No. 140] is denied without prejudice. See attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 2/22/2016. Mailed notice(ber, )
February 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 204 ORDER: Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission's Motion to Allow Out-of-Town Investor Witness to Testify by Live Video at the Trial of the SEC's Claims against Defendant Stephen Ferrone [ECF No. 198] is denied. See attached Statement for further details. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 2/11/2016. Mailed notice (ber, )
October 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 189 Enter MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 10/21/2015. Mailed notice (jdh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities And Exchange Commission v. Ferrone et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: Tracy W. Lo
Represented By: Eric M. Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen D. Ferrone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas A. McClain, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas A McClain, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James T. Miceli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Immunosyn Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Argyll Biotechnologies, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Argyll Equities, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Padmore Holdings, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?