Grissette v. Perez et al
| Dijon R Grissette |
| Liam Dixon, Nemura Pencyla, John Barsanti, Jason Russel, Chris Peeler, Kane County, C/O Salsbury, Michael Seyller, Sgt. Eby, Pat Perez, Corey Hunger, Lt. Smith, Wayne Carter, Greg Flowers, Lt. Hickey, Walter Edwards, Ron Harn, Stan Towers, D. Hanson, Mike Beatus, Brian Lewis and C/O Usmani |
| 1:2011cv05786 |
| August 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Randolph |
| Harry D. Leinenweber |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 3/26/2012: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 29 ), is denied. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Sloan v. Lesza, 181 F.3d 857 (7th Cir. 1999). The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the PLRA Attorney, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (ao,)
|
|
Filing
9
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 10/3/2011: The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 3 ), is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at the plaintiff's place of incarc eration to make monthly deductions in accordance with thisorder. The clerk shall send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at the Menard Correctional Center. The complaint (Dkt. No. 1 ), is dismissed on initial review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The Court dismisses without prejudice any state law claim and claims that plaintiff attempts to bring on behalf of plaintiffs Douglas Postlewaite and Blanca L. Garza. The plaintiff was previously assessed a strike under § 1915(g) in Grissette v. Ramsey, No. 02 C 4325 (N.D. Ill.), and Grissette v. Hill, No. 05 C 1132 (N.D. Ill.). This case is the plaintiffs third strike. He is warned that he must comply with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and Sloan v. Lesza, 181 F.3d 858 (7th Cir. 1999). Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 5 ), and any other pending motions are moot. The clerk is requested to enter a Rule 58 Judgment in favor of defendants against plaintiff. [ For further details see written opinion] Civil Case Terminated.Mailed notice(hp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
