Magistrelli v. Magistrelli
| Karol Magistrelli |
| Judge Brodsky, Michael Waller, Jane Drew Waller, Michael Danforth, Gary C Magistrelli, David Kerpel, Shaw Law, LTD. LLC, Mark Shaw and Jeremy Spitzer |
| 1:2011cv06831 |
| September 28, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Kane |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 10/28/2011: Before the Court is Plaintiffs emergency motion to amend her complaint and to clarify her jurisdictional statement 7 . For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in pa rt and denies in part Plaintiffs motion. The Court grants Plaintiffs motion to the extent that it asks the Court to alter or amend its October 5, 2011 order. However, upon further review of Plaintiffs original complaint and her motion to amend her co mplaint, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has failed to set forth a basis for federal jurisdiction and that any attempt to amend her complaint would be futile. Accordingly, the Court dismisses Plaintiffs original complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denies Plaintiffs motion to amend her complaint. Plaintiffs case is again dismissed without prejudice, with leave to bring any state law civil claims that she may have in state court, if appropriate. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
