United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Amella et al
United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
Stephen P Amella and Andre J Hayden |
1:2011cv06849 |
September 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Blanche M. Manning |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 12/10/2012:The SECs motion for entry of final judgment 47 is granted. The clerk shall place Mr. Haydens 11/19/2012 letter on the docket. He is again reminded that any further commun ications with the court MUST be made via motion served on the SEC. Further letters will not be considered for any reason. This order disposes of all claims as to all parties so the clerk shall enter a Rule 58 judgment as follows: Judgment is ent ered in favor of the SEC and against Mr. Amella. Mr. Amella shall disgorge $39,170 plus $7,980.79 in prejudgment interest plus a civil penalty of$78,340, for a total of $125,490.79. It is further ordered that judgment is ente red in favor of the SEC and against Mr. Hayden. Mr. Hayden shall disgorge $34,170 plus $7,515.15 in prejudgment interest plus a civil penalty in the amount of $85,000, for a total of $126,685.15. (For further details see attached Order) Mailed notice(tlp, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.