N.B. v. Hamos
| N. B., R. F., J. J., M. Wh. and M. Wa. |
| Julie Hamos |
| 1:2011cv06866 |
| September 29, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Rebecca R. Pallmeyer |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
152
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. The Court overrules plaintiffs' objections 144 to Magistrate Judge Cole's Report and Recommendation entered on November 25, 2015, adopts the Report and Recommendation 143 in its entirety, denies plaintiffs& #039; motion to enforce settlement agreement 119 , and grants certain plaintiffs' motion for non-joinder in the objections and motion to enforce 147 to the extent that the Court recognizes that there is a conflict amongclass co-counsel regarding whether there is a basis for the motion and objections. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 12/11/2015. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 2/13/2014:Mailed notice(air, )
|
|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 12/5/2013:Mailed notice(air, )
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 5/30/2012: Mailed notice(etv, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
