Lynd v. Bristol Kendall Fire Protection District et al
| Robert Lynd |
| Bristol Kendall Fire Protection District, Michael Hitzemann, gary frederick and Public Safety Services Inc |
| 1:2011cv07014 |
| October 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Kendall |
| Joan B. Gottschall |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 9/2/2015. Mailed notice(mjc, )
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER : Enter Order. For the reasons set forth in the attached order, the Fire District defendants' motion to dismiss 34 is granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, Lynds conspiracy to deny due process claim (Count II) is dismissed with prejudice but the remainder of the motion to dismiss is denied. In addition, Public Safety Services' motion for judgment on the pleadings 46 is granted. If Lynd wishes to seek permission to file a second amended complaint against Public Safety Services, he must file a motion and establish that this relief is warranted. Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 7/25/2013. Mailed notice. (ea, )
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 7/26/2012.(mr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
