Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC v. Dell Inc.
Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC |
Dell Inc. |
1:2011cv07264 |
October 13, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Matthew F. Kennelly |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 124 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 1/2/2014: The Court rules on the disputed claim terms as set forth in the accompanying decision. These cases are set for a further status hearing before the undersigned jud ge on January 21, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. The parties are directed to confer prior to that date regarding whether there are additional common issues that might warrant expansion of the IOP 13 pretrial consolidation and are to submit a status report contai ning their positions in this regard by no later than January 17, 2014. The status report should include each party's positions on what, if any, further fact discovery is appropriate under Local Patent Rule 1.3 as well as each party's intentions with regard to the disclosure of expert witnesses. (mk) |
Filing 103 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 7/5/2013: Defendants' motions to dismiss are denied for the reasons stated in this decision. Prior to 7/15/2013, counsel are to confer regarding a joint schedule for claim construction in this and the other cases assigned to Judge Kennelly for joint determination of that issue. (mk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.