Miller v. Cook County Courts et al
| Michael Miller |
| Cook County Courts and Cook County Jail |
| 1:2011cv07693 |
| October 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Randolph |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 1/9/2012: Plaintiff Michael Miller's amended complaint [ 6 ], which superceded his complaint [ 1 ], is dismissed without prejudice. His motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (&q uot;IFP") [ 3 ] [ 5 ] are denied without prejudice. To proceed with this case, by 2/9/2012 Miller must both: (1) either file a completed IFP application or prepay the full $350 filing fee, and (2) submit another amended complaint in accorda nce with this order. If Miller seeks habeas corpus relief, such as release from custody, he may file a habeas corpus petition in a separate action after the exhaustion of state court remedies. Miller's failure to respond to this order by 2/9/2012 will result in the dismissal of this case with prejudice as to any non-habeas claims and without prejudice to Miller submitting a habeas petition in a separate action. (For further details see Written Opinion). Mailed notice. (et, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
