Wilson vs. Carrier IQ, Inc.
| Jeffrey Wilson |
| Carrier IQ, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv08579 |
| December 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Joan H. Lefkow |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC Acknowledgment of case transferred to the California Northern District as case 3:12-cv-02150, filed 04/30/2012. (lcw, ) |
| Filing 10 TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of California the electronic record. (ea, ) |
| Filing 9 TRANSFER ORDER from MDL Panel transferring case to Northern District of California. (ea, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER Signed by the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 2/2/2012:Mailed notice(mad, )
|
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before Honorable Joan H. Lefkow:Defendant's agreed motion for extension of time for defendant to respond to complaint 5 is granted. Enter Order. Carrier IQ's deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint in the above-captioned case is extended until forty-five days after the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issues an order deciding the MDL Motion, or as otherwise ordered by the MDL transferee court if the MDL Motion is granted; provided, however, that in the event that Carrier IQ should agree to an earlier response date in any of the MDL Cases, Carrier IQ will respond to the complaint in the above-captioned case on that earlier date.Mailed notice (mad, ) |
| Filing 6 Agreed NOTICE of Motion by Ryan Jason Rodman for presentment of motion for extension of time to file response/reply 5 before Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 2/2/2012 at 08:30 AM. (Rodman, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Defendant Carrier IQ, Inc. for extension of time to file response/reply Agreed Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant Carrier IQ, Inc. to Respond to Complaint (Rodman, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Carrier IQ, Inc. by Neil E. Holmen (Holmen, Neil) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Carrier IQ, Inc. by Ryan Jason Rodman (Rodman, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeffrey Wilson by Judy Lynn Cates (Cates, Judy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jeffrey Wilson; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0752-6621706. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cates, Judy) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. (mh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wilson vs. Carrier IQ, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeffrey Wilson | |
| Represented By: | Judy Lynn Cates |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Carrier IQ, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
