Mnyofu v. Village of Matteson Police Department et al
| Komaa Mnyofu |
| Village of Matteson Police Department, Rasheem J Beck and Robert Wilson |
| 1:2011cv08639 |
| December 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Blanche M. Manning |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 1/26/2012: The court's screening of plaintiff Komaa Mnyofu's complaint reveals that an underlying criminal matter remains pending in state court. For the reasons discussed below , the court stays Mnyofu's claims pending the outcome of his state criminal proceeding. His motion to proceed in forma pauperis [4-1] is denied without prejudice to Mnyofu's refiling the motion after the stay has been lifted. His motion for leave to proceed pro se [5-1] is stricken as unnecessary as a plaintiff is entitled to proceed pro se without court permission. The clerk is directed to place this case on the court's suspense docket. Mnyofu shall file a status report no later than April 23, 2012, advising the court of the status of his state criminal proceeding. If Mnyofu fails to file the status report, his case may be dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution. Mailed notice (tlm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
