Dansberry v. Johnson et al
| Percell Dansberry |
| Yolande Johnson |
| 1:2011cv08719 |
| December 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Alexander |
| James F. Holderman |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Percell Dansberry's petition for writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, (Dkt. No. 1), is denied. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the Unite d States District Courts, this court certifies for appeal the following questions: (1) whether clearly established Supreme Court precedent required the Appellate Court of Illinois to vacate Dansberry's underlying guilty plea without addressing t he prejudicial effect of the trial court's failure to admonish Dansberry regarding his combined mandatory minimum sentence of twenty-six years and (2) whether this due process error during Dansberry's change-of-plea hearing is susceptible to Brecht's harmless-error standard of review in federal court. Terminate case. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 11/8/2013:Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
|
Filing
23
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 6/27/2012: Petitioner having shown cause why his petition should not be dismissed as untimely, the Court directs Respondent to answer the petition or otherwise respond within 30 days of the date of this order. Entered by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 6/27/2012. Mailed notice (tlm)
|
|
Filing
6
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 1/10/2012: Petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and has paid the $5.00 filing fee. His motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ 3] is denied as unnecessary. It appears from the face of thepetition that it is untimely. Accordingly, Petitioner is given 30 days from the date of this order to show cause why this petition should not be dismissed as time-barred. Petitioners failure to submit a pleading in this court demonstrating that his petition is timely within 30 days will result in the dismissal of this case. Petitioner's motion for the appointment of counsel 4 is denied without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 1/10/2012. Mailed notice (tlm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dansberry v. Johnson et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Yolande Johnson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Percell Dansberry | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
