Pippen v. Comcast Corporation et al
Plaintiff Scottie Pippen alleged that defendants falsely reported that he had filed for bankruptcy, thereby damaging his personal and professional reputation.
| Scottie Pippen |
| Comcast Corporation, General Electric Company, CBS Corporation, Arizona State University Foundation for a New American University, Yakezie Network, Mint Software Inc, Investing Answers. com, Sportsreport360., Evolve Media Corporation and University of Tampa, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv08834 |
| December 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Lake |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Scottie Pippen by Jefferey Ogden Katz (Katz, Jefferey) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Scottie Pippen by Arthur S. Gold (Gold, Arthur) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gold, Arthur) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Scottie Pippen; Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0752-6653080. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit, # 10 Exhibit)(Gold, Arthur) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. (vcf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
