Sekendur v. McCandliss et al
| Batur Sekendur and Oral F Sekendur |
| Glenn A McCandliss and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC |
| Mensure Sekendur, Batur Sekendur and Nafiz Sekendur |
| Glenn A McCandliss |
| Glenn A McCandliss |
| Oral F Sekendur |
| 1:2011cv08981 |
| December 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| James F. Holderman |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
201
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. McCandliss's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 139) is granted as to each of the eight counts alleged in Oral's complaint against McCandliss, and denied with respect to McCandliss's claims against the Sekendurs. Oral's complaint against McCandliss is entirely dismissed with prejudice. The summary judgment motion of Batur, Nafiz, and Mesrure (Dkt. No. 158) is granted. McCandliss's claims against Batur, Nafiz, and Mesrure are dismissed wit h prejudice. Oral's motion for summary judgment against McCandliss (Dkt. No. 184) is granted with respect to McCandliss's claims against Oral, and denied with respect to Oral's claims against McCandliss. McCandliss's claims agains t Oral are dismissed with prejudice. The only claims remaining in this case are Oral's claims against MSSB, which have been stayed pending arbitration. (Dkt. No. 25.) A status hearing is set for 10/10/13 at 9:00 am for a report on the status of the pending arbitration and to determine if this civil case can be terminated. Counsel for Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC is requested to be present at the status hearing on 10/10/13. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 9/23/2013. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
|
Filing
82
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 5/21/2012:For the reasons explained in the Statement section of the order, plaintiff Oral F. Sekendur's motion for leave to file an answer 73 is denied. Sekendur's "Motio n to Dismiss without Prejudice or Alternatively Stay" 75 , his request to proceed in forma pauperis 77 , and his motion for appointment of counsel 78 are also denied. Defendant Glenn A. McCandliss's motion 79 is granted in part and de nied in part. Because the court has denied Sekendur's motions, McCandliss's motion to strike docket entries 73, 75, 77, and 78 is denied as moot. McCandliss's motion to dismiss Sekendur's claims with prejudice for lack of prosecut ion is denied. McCandliss's request for entry of default against Sekendur on McCandlisss counterclaims, however, is granted. The parties and their counsel, if any, need not appear at the court's 5/22/12 motion call as all matters in this ca se scheduled for that motion call have been resolved. Pursuant to docket entry 70, the parties are to confer pursuant to Rule 26(f) and file an agreed Form 52 on or before 5/25/12. The case is set for further status and entry of a scheduling order at 9:00 am on 6/7/12. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 5/21/2012: Mailed notice (am)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
