Brown v. Sajjad et al
| Archie Brown |
| Mr. Sajjad |
| 1:2012cv00049 |
| January 4, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Brown |
| Marvin E. Aspen |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ENTER MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated, the Court grants Roseland Community Hospital's motion to join Dr. Sajjad's motion for summary judgment 62 . The Court also grants Defendants' motion for summary judgment 52 and enters judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff Archie Brown's claims are dismissed. The Court also denies Plaintiff's motion for supplemental jurisdiction over his state-law claims 72 , as the Court addressed this contention in its orders of 8/23/12 [see 36] and 3/21/13 [see 49]. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 12/23/2013. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
36
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 8/23/2012: Defendants motion to dismiss 24 is granted in part and denied in part. To the extent the Third Amended Complaint asserts state-law claims of negligence or malpractice, the claims are dismissed. The Court will read the allegations in the Third Amended Complaint as asserting only deliberate indifference claims. The motion to dismiss is denied with respect to Defendants' contention that they cannot be considered state actors under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants are directed to answer the Third Amended Complaint or otherwise plead within 30 days of this order. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
13
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 4/4/2012: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint (# 76 in case no. 10 C 3609) is granted. His amended complaint should be filed in case no. 12 C 49. Plaintiff may proceed with his amended complaint (# 12 in case no. 12 C 49) against Dr. Sajjad and Roseland Community Hospital. The Clerk shall issue summons for service of the amended complaint on these Defendants by the U.S. Marshal. The Court clarifies that its 2/13/12 order in case no. 10 C 3609 # 67 consolidated these cases for discovery only. A separate clarification order will be entered in case no. 10 C 3609. This order will be entered in only case no. 12 C 49. Plaintiff still may file an amended complaint in case no. 10 C 3610 in accordance with the Court's 3/13/12 order. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 4/4/2012: Mailed notice (tlm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Sajjad et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Archie Brown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mr. Sajjad | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
