Gray v. Carter et al
| Doiakah Gray |
| Imhotep Carter, Marcus Hardy, Joe Sheeny and Steven Fischman |
| 1:2012cv00244 |
| January 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Will |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
162
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Written by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 3/27/2015. (lcw, )
|
|
Filing
5
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 1/23/2012: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted. The court authorizes and orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $20.90 from his account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial filing fee, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at t he Stateville Correctional Center. The Clerk is directed to issue summonses for service on Defendants by the Marshals Service. The Clerk is further directed to send Plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form, Instructions for Submitting Documents, and a copy of this order. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 4 is denied without prejudice. [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice. (mr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
