Instant Technology, LLC v. Defazio et al
| Instant Technology, LLC |
| Elizabeth Defazio, Laura Rehn, Megan Marker, Bethany Meek, Erin Bauer and Joel Katz |
| 1:2012cv00491 |
| January 23, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| James F. Holderman |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
275
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. The court determines based on the evidence presented at the April 2014 trial that Instant failed to meet its burden to prove any of the counts alleged in Instant's First Amended Verified Complaint. Instant withdrew its request for injunctive relief. Instant failed to prove the Employee Defendants breached their Employment Agreements with Instant (Count I) or their fiduciary duties to Instant (Count IV). Instant also failed to prove that any of the Defendants v iolated the Illinois Trade Secrets Act (Count II) or the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (Count V), or that any of the Defendants committed any common law torts (Counts III and VI) or participated in a civil conspiracy (Count VII). The court also finds that DeFazio is not entitled to the remainder of the 2011 bonus she is seeking, but DeFazio need not return what she was given. The court directs the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of Defendants on all of Instant's claims and in favor of Insta nt on DeFazio's counterclaim. The court requests the parties to seek to resolve amicably any issues they may have regarding costs or fees. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 5/2/2014. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
|
Filing
220
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Geraldine Soat Brown on 11/8/2013. (psm, )
|
|
Filing
217
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Defendants' motion to strike paragraphs 5-8 of Dwight Steward's updated expert report 204 is granted. Paragraphs 5-8 of Dwight Steward's updated expert report [204 Ex. C.] are struck. Nothing in this or der prevents Instant Technology from relying on the facts underlying paragraphs 5-8 of Steward's report. The schedule set on August 22, 2013 215 remains in effect. The parties are once again encouraged to discuss settlement. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 9/3/2013. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
|
Filing
178
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Instant Technology's motion for leave to file a second amended verified complaint 150 is denied, and its motion to compel documents and to extend discovery 156 is granted in part and denied in part. The court wi ll not extend the January 18, 2013 deadline, and will not compel production of the documents Instant Technology requests. The court will, however, allow Instant Technology to supplement the report of its damages expert by 6/20/13. A status hearing is set for 6/27/13 at 9 am to set further dates, including dates for trial and for potentially dispositive motions. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 6/4/2013: Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
|
Filing
125
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Geraldine Soat Brown on 1/22/2013.(psm, )
|
|
Filing
19
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 2/1/2012: Consistent with the discussions in open court, "Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Brief in Excess of 15 Pages" 13 is granted and plaintiff Instant Technology , LLC's "Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction" 4 is taken under advisement. Instant Technology's Motion for Expedited Discovery" 6 is granted, and counsel are to confer and file a modified Fo rm 52 setting the scope of expedited discovery and the dates by which it can be completed. An evidentiary hearing and briefing schedule, if necessary, will be set at the status report on 2/2/12 at 10:00 am. The parties are encouraged to discuss settlement. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 2/1/2012: Mailed notice (am)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
