Banfield v. Spherion Staffing LLC
Plaintiff: Daniel Banfield
Defendant: Spherion Staffing LLC
Case Number: 1:2012cv00874
Filed: February 7, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Suzanne B Conlon
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2012 Filing 45 MINUTE entry before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon: Parties report case settled. Case is dismissed pursuant to settlement. All pending motions [6,14,16,18 and 38] are moot. Mailed notice (air, )
May 8, 2012 Filing 44 MINUTE entry before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon: Plaintiffs motion for leave to file response to motion to dismiss, instanter #38 is taken under advisement. The motion will not be heard as noticed on May 8, 2012. Mailed notice (air, )
May 4, 2012 Filing 43 SUR-REPLY by Defendant Spherion Staffing LLC. (psm, )
May 4, 2012 Filing 42 MINUTE entry before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon: Defendant's motion for leave to file a sur-reply #35 in support of its motion to dismiss is granted. The motion will not be heard as noticed on May 8, 2012.Mailed notice (air, )
May 4, 2012 Filing 40 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Spherion Staffing LLC (Maatman, Gerald)
May 3, 2012 Filing 39 NOTICE of Motion by James Morris McClintick for presentment of motion to file instanter #38 before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon on 5/8/2012 at 09:00 AM. (McClintick, James)
May 3, 2012 Filing 38 MOTION by Plaintiff Daniel Banfield to file instanter Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(McClintick, James)
May 3, 2012 Filing 37 MINUTE entry before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon:A rule is issued against plaintiff to show written cause by May 15, 2012, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of federal diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. 1332. The court has an independent duty to ensure subject matter jurisdiction exists. Johnson v. Wattenbarger, 361 F.3d 991, 992 (7th Cir. 2004). For diversity purposes, a limited liability company shares citizenship with each of its members. Wise v. Wachovia Sec., LLC,, 450 F.3d 265, 267 (7th Cir. 2006). The complaint does not identify the members of Spherion Staffing LLC or their citizenship.Mailed notice (air, )
May 3, 2012 Filing 36 NOTICE of Motion by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr for presentment of motion for leave to file #35 before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon on 5/8/2012 at 09:00 AM. (Maatman, Gerald)
May 3, 2012 Filing 35 MOTION by Defendant Spherion Staffing LLC for leave to file , Instanter, Sur-Reply In Support Of Its Motion Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 and 23 To Dismiss And/Or Strike Plaintiffs Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Maatman, Gerald)
May 2, 2012 Filing 41 MINUTE entry before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file supplemental authority instanter #33 is granted. The motion will not be heard as noticed on May 8, 2012.Mailed notice (air, )
May 1, 2012 Filing 34 NOTICE of Motion by Gregg Michael Barbakoff for presentment of motion to supplement #33 before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon on 5/8/2012 at 09:00 AM. (Barbakoff, Gregg)
May 1, 2012 Filing 33 MOTION by Plaintiff Daniel Banfield to supplement Response in Opposition to Spherion's Motion to Strike and/or Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Barbakoff, Gregg)
April 30, 2012 Filing 32 REPLY by Defendant Spherion Staffing LLC to motion to dismiss #18 Reply in Support of Defendant's Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 and 23 to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff''s Complaint (Maatman, Gerald)
April 24, 2012 Filing 31 RESPONSE by Daniel Banfield in Opposition to MOTION by Defendant Spherion Staffing LLC to dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff's Complaint #18 (Siprut, Joseph)
April 20, 2012 Filing 30 MINUTE entry before Honorable Young B. Kim: Plaintiff's motion for protective order and to compel discovery #22 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff seeks a protective order to justify his refusal to "return" documents to Defendant that are related to the lawsuit but not the subject of any discovery request. Plaintiff's motion does not invoke a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure that would entitle him to such relief. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 (c)(1) provides that a "party or any person from whom discovery is sought may move for a protective order in the court where the action is pending," but this Rule does not apply here because, as Plaintiff acknowledges, Defendant has not sought the documents in question through discovery. (R. 22, Pl.'s Mot. at 1 ("Spherion has not actually issued any discovery"), 4 ("Spherion has not issued any discovery requests").) To decide whether Plaintiff may withhold the documents sought by Defendant would require this court to rule on the merits of a separate contractual dispute between the parties, which is an issue not properly before this court. This court declines to render such an opinion. Also, Plaintiff's request to compel Defendant to respond to his written discovery requests is, as correctly argued by Defendant, premature. According to the motion, Plaintiff served his written discovery requests on Defendant on March 29, 2012. Pursuant to Rule 33(b)(2), Defendant has until April 28, 2012, to serve its discovery responses. Because the assigned District Judge did not stay discovery in this case pending her ruling on Defendant's motion to dismiss, this time frame still applies in this case. If Defendant believes that it should be excused from answering the outstanding discovery requests until the assigned District Judge rules on the motion to dismiss, which is allegedly dispositive of this entire case, it should move to have discovery stayed as soon as possible. The motion hearing scheduled for April 24, 2012, at 10:30 a.m. is cancelled. All matters relating to the referral of this action having been concluded, the referral is closed and the case is returned to the assigned District Judge. Mailed notice (aac, )
April 17, 2012 Filing 29 RESPONSE by Spherion Staffing LLCin Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Daniel Banfield to strike Defendant's Rule 68 Offer of Judgment #14 (Maatman, Gerald)
April 16, 2012 Filing 28 MINUTE entry before Honorable Young B. Kim: This matter having been assigned to this court, a motion hearing on Plaintiff's motion for a protective order and to compel discovery #22 will be held on April 24, 2012, at 10:30 a.m. in courtroom 1944D. Parties will be expected to argue the motion at that time. Mailed notice (aac, )
April 10, 2012 Filing 27 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case referred to the Honorable Young B. Kim pursuant to Local Rule 72.1. Signed by Executive Committee on 4/10/12.(psm, )
April 10, 2012 Filing 26 MINUTE entry before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon:Plaintiffs motion to strike defendants Rule 68 offer of judgment #14 is taken under advisement. Defendant shall respond by April 17, 2012. Plaintiffs motion for clarification #16 is taken under advisement. Plaintiffs motion for protective order and to compel discovery #22 is referred to Magistrate Judge Kim. Defendants motion for leave to file instanter its response in opposition to plaintiffs motion for protective order and motion to compel #24 is granted. The motions will not be heard as noticed on April 10, 2012. Mailed notice (air, )
April 5, 2012 Filing 25 NOTICE of Motion by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr for presentment of motion to file instanter, #24 before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon on 4/10/2012 at 09:00 AM. (Maatman, Gerald)
April 5, 2012 Filing 24 MOTION by Defendant Spherion Staffing LLC to file instanter its Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Compel Discovery (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Defendant's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Compel Discovery)(Maatman, Gerald)
April 3, 2012 Filing 23 NOTICE of Motion by Aleksandra M. S. Vold for presentment of motion to compel,, motion for protective order, #22 before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon on 4/10/2012 at 09:00 AM. (Vold, Aleksandra)
April 3, 2012 Filing 22 MOTION by Plaintiff Daniel Banfield to compel discovery, MOTION by Plaintiff Daniel Banfield for protective order (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Vold, Aleksandra)
April 2, 2012 Filing 21 MINUTE entry before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon: Defendants motion pursuant FRCP 12 and 23 to dismiss and/or strike plaintiffs complaint #18 is taken under advisement. Plaintiff shall respond by 4/23/2012. Defendants reply is due by 4/30/2012. The motion will not be heard as noticed on April 5, 2012. Mailed notice (air, )
March 30, 2012 Filing 20 MEMORANDUM by Spherion Staffing LLC of Law in support of Defendant's Motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 and 23 to Dismiss #18 and/or Strike Plaintiff's Complaint (Maatman, Gerald) (Docket Text modified by Clerks' Office.)
March 30, 2012 Filing 19 NOTICE of Motion by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr for presentment of motion to dismiss #18 before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon on 4/5/2012 at 09:00 AM. (Maatman, Gerald)
March 30, 2012 Filing 18 MOTION by Defendant Spherion Staffing LLC to dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff's Complaint (Maatman, Gerald)
March 30, 2012 Filing 17 NOTICE of Motion by Aleksandra M. S. Vold for presentment of motion to clarify #16 before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon on 4/10/2012 at 09:00 AM. (Vold, Aleksandra)
March 30, 2012 Filing 16 MOTION by Plaintiff Daniel Banfield for clarification (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Vold, Aleksandra) (Docket Text modified by Clerks' Office.)
March 29, 2012 Filing 15 NOTICE of Motion by Aleksandra M. S. Vold for presentment of motion to strike #14 before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon on 4/10/2012 at 09:00 AM. (Vold, Aleksandra)
March 29, 2012 Filing 14 MOTION by Plaintiff Daniel Banfield to strike Defendant's Rule 68 Offer of Judgment (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Vold, Aleksandra)
March 20, 2012 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon:Plaintiffs supporting memorandum for class certification #6 is due April 17, 2012. Defendants response due May 18, 2012. Plaintiffs reply is due May 30, 2012.Mailed notice (air, ) ( Modified on 3/28/2012 (air, ).
March 5, 2012 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon: Status hearing held. Parties shall comply with FRCP 26(a)(1) by March 12, 2012. Plaintiffs compliance with FRCP 26(a)(2) by July 6, 2012. Defendants compliance with FRCP 26(a)(2) by August 3, 2012. Discovery cutoff and filing of dispositive motions with supporting memoranda due September 4, 2012. Submission of the joint final pretrial order and agreed pattern jury instructions set on September 25, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.; plaintiffs draft to be submitted to defendant by September 18, 2012. Case is placed on the October TRIAL CALENDAR. THESE ARE FIRM DATES. If a settlement conference before the designated Magistrate Judge will be helpful, please call the courtroom deputy at (312) 435-5596.Mailed notice (air, )
March 2, 2012 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Spherion Staffing LLC by Matthew James Gagnon (Gagnon, Matthew)
February 23, 2012 Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Spherion Staffing LLC by Reema Kapur (Kapur, Reema)
February 23, 2012 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Spherion Staffing LLC by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr (Maatman, Gerald)
February 21, 2012 Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Daniel Banfield by Aleksandra M. S. Vold (Vold, Aleksandra)
February 17, 2012 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Daniel Banfield by James Morris McClintick (McClintick, James)
February 17, 2012 Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Daniel Banfield to certify class (Vold, Aleksandra)
February 13, 2012 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon: Status hearing set for March 5, 2012 at 09:00 A.M. At the status hearing, the parties are to report on the following: 1. Possibility of settlement in the case; 2. If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to get the case ready for trial. Plaintiff is directed to advise all other parties of the courts action herein and to forward a copy of the courts procedure guidelines to defendant(s). The standing order on case management procedures is available on the courts website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/JUDGE/CONLON/sbcpage.htm or can be picked up from the courtroom deputy in room 1744. Mailed notice (air, )
February 8, 2012 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. (ef, )
February 7, 2012 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Daniel Banfield by Joseph J Siprut (Siprut, Joseph)
February 7, 2012 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Daniel Banfield by Gregg Michael Barbakoff (Barbakoff, Gregg)
February 7, 2012 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Barbakoff, Gregg)
February 7, 2012 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Daniel Banfield ; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0752-6816074. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Barbakoff, Gregg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Banfield v. Spherion Staffing LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Banfield
Represented By: Joseph J Siprut
Represented By: Aleksandra M. S. Vold
Represented By: James Morris McClintick
Represented By: Gregg M. Barbakoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spherion Staffing LLC
Represented By: Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
Represented By: Matthew James Gagnon
Represented By: Reema Kapur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?