Nichols v. Illinois Department Of Transportation
| Demarco Nichols |
| Illinois Department Of Transportation |
| 1:2012cv01789 |
| March 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Ronald A. Guzman |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
398
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the attached order, Longo's motion for sanctions, R. 366 , and the supplement to that motion, R. 368 , are denied. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 2/22/2022. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
|
Filing
364
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons explained in the opinion, the contingency fee dispute between DeMarco Nichols and Joseph Longo is not within the supplemental jurisdiction of this Court. Accordingly, Nichols' motion, R. 343 , is denied. Longo's motion to strike Nichols' response brief, R. 360 , is denied as moot. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 4/29/2021. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
|
Filing
305
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Nichols' petition, 290 , in part and awards $774,584.50 in attorney's fees and $4,061.02 in costs, for a total amount of $778,645.50. The Court awards $4,061.02 in taxable costs as agreed to by the parties. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 1/10/2019:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
|
Filing
174
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' motion for summary judgment 135 is denied. Further, within fourteen days from the date of entry of this order, IDOT may file a supplemental memorandum of law of no more than five pages explaining why the Court should not enter summary judgment against IDOT on Nichol's retaliation claim based on IDOT's denial of Nichols's post-termination grievance. Nichols may file a response brief of the same length within fourteen days thereafter. No reply briefs shall be filed. If IDOT fails to file a supplemental memorandum of law, the Court will assume that IDOT concedes that no factual disputes exist regarding Nichols's retaliation claim based on the d enial of his post-termination grievance, and will enter partial summary judgment in favor of Nichols on that claim in accordance with the reasoning set forth in this opinion.This case is set for a jury trial on June 13, 2016. It was represented by the parties that the trial will last no more than 5 days. The case is set for a status hearing on 1/27/2016 at 09:00 a.m. to discuss trial scheduling issues. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 1/19/2016:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nichols v. Illinois Department Of Transportation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Demarco Nichols | |
| Represented By: | Joseph A. Longo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Illinois Department Of Transportation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
