Yasko v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Northern District Yasko v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

Yasko v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	Laura Yasko
Defendant:	Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Case Number:	1:2012cv02658
Filed:	April 11, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Suzanne B. Conlon
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 30, 2014	Filing 52 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 6/30/2014:Mailed notice(air, )
October 9, 2012	Filing 24 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 10/9/2012: As explained in the Statement section of this order, the defendants motion for a protective order and to quash a subpoena 18 is granted in part and denied in part. Because Dr . Hollands deposition appears reasonably likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, the motion to quash that deposition is denied. Pursuant to Rule 45, Dr. Hollands deposition should take place within 100 miles of his office in Saratoga Springs, NY unless the witness and both parties agree to an alternative location. Because the plaintiff has not shown that deposing Ms. Brunner, Ms. Lubrecht, and Ms. Bellinger is reasonably likely to lead to the discovery of relevant and admissible evidence, the Court grants the defendants motion for a protective order precluding the plaintiff from deposing those three witnesses.(For further details see minute order) Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 10/9/2012.Mailed notice(air, )

Date Filed

Document Text

June 30, 2014

Filing 52 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 6/30/2014:Mailed notice(air, )

October 9, 2012

Filing 24 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 10/9/2012: As explained in the Statement section of this order, the defendants motion for a protective order and to quash a subpoena 18 is granted in part and denied in part. Because Dr . Hollands deposition appears reasonably likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, the motion to quash that deposition is denied. Pursuant to Rule 45, Dr. Hollands deposition should take place within 100 miles of his office in Saratoga Springs, NY unless the witness and both parties agree to an alternative location. Because the plaintiff has not shown that deposing Ms. Brunner, Ms. Lubrecht, and Ms. Bellinger is reasonably likely to lead to the discovery of relevant and admissible evidence, the Court grants the defendants motion for a protective order precluding the plaintiff from deposing those three witnesses.(For further details see minute order) Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 10/9/2012.Mailed notice(air, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yasko v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura Yasko
Represented By:	Mark D. DeBofsky
Represented By:	Robert J. Napleton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?