Betts v. Godinez et al
Petitioner: Kevin Betts
Respondent: Salvador A Godinez
Case Number: 1:2012cv02711
Filed: April 12, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Alexander
Presiding Judge: Samuel Der-Yeghiayan
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM Opinion Signed by the Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan on 12/4/20121(ym, )
June 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan on 6/28/2012:For the reasons stated below, Petitioner's motion to reconsider 10 is denied. Petitioner has also filed pro se motions seeking leave to file instanter additional exh ibits 7 for his Petition 7 , a supplemental Petition 11 , and an amended memorandum of law in support of his Petition 12 . Such motions 7 , 11 , and 12 to supplement are granted. Petitioner having paid the filing fee, Respondent is given until 07/30/12 to answer, move or otherwise plead to Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus. In the event the Respondent answers Petitioner's petition, Petitioner is given until 08/30/12 to file his reply in further support of hi s petition. Should Respondent move to dismiss, Petitioner is given until 08/30/12 to file his response and Respondent is given until 09/06/12 to file his reply in further support of his motion to dismiss. Status hearing set for 11/08/12 at 9:00 a.m. [ For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (tg, )
May 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan on 5/8/2012: For the reasons stated below, Petitioner's motion for stay and abeyance of Habeas Corpus 4 is denied. Petitioner's motion for leave to file a memorandum in supp ort of his Petition 5 is granted. Petitioner's motion to file Habeas Corpus petition under previously paid filing fee 3 is denied. Petitioner brought a new action in filing the instant Petition, and it is incumbent on him to pay a new fil ing fee if he wants to proceed in this new action. Petitioner is given until June 7, 2012, to pay the filing fee. Petitioner is warned that failure to pay the filing fee by June 7, 2012, will result in the dismissal of the instant action. [ For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (tg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Betts v. Godinez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Salvador A Godinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kevin Betts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?