Love EL v. City of Chicago, et al
| Sheik L Love EL |
| City of Chicago and Angel Grasser |
| 1:2012cv02725 |
| April 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 5/13/2013. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
27
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 10/17/2012: Plaintiff has filed motions which request an extension of time to file his response to Defendants motion to dismiss 24 and for appointment of counsel 25 . The motion for extension of time 24 is granted; Plaintiff's response brief is now due on 11/15/2012; Defendants are given until 12/6/2012 to file their reply. Plaintiff's for appointment of counsel 25 is denied for the reasons stated below. Notice of motion date of 10/18/2012 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
20
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 10/2/2012: For the reasons stated below, the Court denies without prejudice Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 17 . The notice of motion date of 10/4/2012 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date. Plaintiff may refile the motion if he attaches a fully completed financial affidavit. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
