James v. Kelner et al
| Ned James |
| David Kelner, Dr. Gomez, Mr. Young, Cheryl Condon, Jane Doe and Mr. Aibert |
| 1:2012cv02820 |
| April 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Matthew F. Kennelly |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 6/11/2012: Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis # 5 is granted. The Court authorizes and orders Cook County Jail officials to deduct $9.17 from Plaintiff 9;s account and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the Supervisor of Inmate Trust Fund Accounts, Cook County Dept. of Corrections Administrative Office, Division V, 2700 S. California, Chicago, Illinois 60608. The Clerk is directed to issue summonses for service on the Defendants by the U.S. Marshal. Plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel # 3 is granted. Donald D. Schwartz, Arnold and Kadjan, 203 North LaSall e Street, Suite 1650, Chicago, Illinois 60601, (312) 236-0415 is appointed to represent Plaintiff in accordance with counsels trial bar obligations under the District Courts Local Rule 83.37 (N.D. Ill.). The case is set for a status hearing on August 13, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel is directed to appear. Mailed notice (For further detail see Written Opinion) (nf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
