Pirard et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 19, 2013
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 3/19/2013: For the reasons stated below, the defendants' motion to dismiss the antitrust claim [80-1] is granted. Because the plaintiffs have had several opportunities to proper ly plead that claim, the dismissal is with prejudice. The motion to stay the remaining claims [80-1] is granted. The case is placed on the Court's suspense docket and the parties are directed to notify this Court within seven days of completion of the state court case. Mailed notice (cjg, )
|September 25, 2012
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 9/25/2012: For the reasons stated below, the defendants motion to dismiss 39 -1] is granted in part. The Sherman Act claim is dismissed. The plaintiffs are given 14 days to reallege the ir antitrust claim. Given that the Court has granted the plaintiffs leave to amend their antitrust claim, it will not address at this time the defendants'request that the Court abstain. The defendants shall answer or otherwise plead within 14 days of the filing of the amended complaint. [ For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (tg, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?