Hernandez v. Hodge et al
Petitioner: Rafael Hernandez
Respondent: Marc Hodge
Case Number: 1:2012cv04332
Filed: June 4, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Lawrence
Presiding Judge: Robert M. Dow
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 4/22/2013: Before the Court are Petitioner's motions for attorney assistance 19 and rehearing 25 . For the reasons stated below, both motions are respectfully denied. Mailed notice(tbk, )
January 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 1/30/2013.(mjc, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hernandez v. Hodge et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rafael Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Marc Hodge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?