Kaplan et al v. Houlihan Smith & Co., Inc. et al
| Donald D. Kaplan and Ian Dolby |
| Houlihan Smith & Co., Inc., Richard Houlihan, Andrew D. Smith, Charles Botchway, Anthony J. Marsala, David L. Heald and Consulting Fiduciaries, Inc. |
| 1:2012cv05134 |
| June 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| John A. Nordberg |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The Court hereby grants final approval of the settlement 130 . The Court approves an incentive award of $1,000.00 each to named plaintiffs Kaplan and Dolby. The Court approves payment of $15,000.00 from the settlement fund to the independent fiduciary Nicholas L. Saakvitne. The Court grants plaintiffs motion for attorneys fees 118 . The Court approves an award of attorneys fees in the amount of $382,500.00 from the settlement fund. The Court a pproves an award of $52,078.70 from the settlement fund to Lewis, Feinberg, Lee, Renaker & Jackson, P.C. as reimbursement for expenses. The Court approves an award of $2,183.75 from the settlement fund to Outten & Golden, LLP for reimbursement of expenses. Case dismissed with prejudice. Signed by the Honorable George M. Marovich on 6/20/2014:Mailed notice(clw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
