Pryor v. United Air Lines

Pryor v. United Air Lines

Plaintiff:	Renee Pryor
Defendant:	United Air Lines Inc
Case Number:	1:2012cv05840
Filed:	July 24, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Robert M. Dow
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 23, 2013	Filing 37 ENTER MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: the Court grants in part and denies in part United's motion 22 . The Court declines to dismiss the case but grants Defendant's request to transfer the case to the Eastern District of Virginia. The Cler k is directed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The Court denies as moot Defendant's other pending motion to dismiss 12 , which Defendant may re-file in the Eastern District of Virginia if it so chooses. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 8/23/2013. Mailed notice(tbk, )
April 12, 2013	Filing 35 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 4/12/2013:The Court gives Plaintiff 14 days from the date of this order to brief whether venue would be proper in the Eastern District of Virginia and, assuming that venue is proper in the Eastern District of Virginia, whether the case ought to be transferred there for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. Mailed notice(tbk, )

Date Filed

Document Text

August 23, 2013

Filing 37 ENTER MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: the Court grants in part and denies in part United's motion 22 . The Court declines to dismiss the case but grants Defendant's request to transfer the case to the Eastern District of Virginia. The Cler k is directed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The Court denies as moot Defendant's other pending motion to dismiss 12 , which Defendant may re-file in the Eastern District of Virginia if it so chooses. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 8/23/2013. Mailed notice(tbk, )

April 12, 2013

Filing 35 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 4/12/2013:The Court gives Plaintiff 14 days from the date of this order to brief whether venue would be proper in the Eastern District of Virginia and, assuming that venue is proper in the Eastern District of Virginia, whether the case ought to be transferred there for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. Mailed notice(tbk, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pryor v. United Air Lines
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United Air Lines Inc
Represented By:	Paul Ehrich Bateman
Represented By:	Shanthi V. Gaur
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Renee Pryor
Represented By:	Spencer Freeman Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?