Lumpkin v. Cook County Public Defender et al
| Leatrice A. Lumpkin |
| Cook County Public Defender, Mary Carol Farmar and Mary Maldonado |
| 1:2012cv05889 |
| July 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Samuel Der-Yeghiayan |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 6/4/2015. Mailed notice(mjc, )
|
|
Filing
57
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 6/18/2013: Defendants' motion to dismiss 43 is granted. Defendant Cook County Public Defender is directed to answer the complaint by 7/16/2013. Status hearing set for 7/23/2013 at 9:30 A.M. Mailed notice. [For further details see written opinion.] (ea, )
|
|
Filing
12
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan on 10/2/2012: Plaintiff having paid the filing fee, Plaintiff's motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 4 , 7 are stricken as moot. Plaintiff's second motion for appointment of counsel 11 is denied. Initial status hearing set for 11/13/12 at 9:00 a.m. At least four working days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall conduct a FRCP 26(f) conference and file a joint written Initial Status Report, not to exceed five pages in length, and file the Court's Joint Jurisdictional Status Report and deliver courtesy copies to this Court's Courtroom Deputy in room 1908. The Court's standing orders on the Initial Status Repo rt and Joint Jurisdictional Status Report maybe obtained from Judge Der-Yeghiayan's web page or from this Court's Courtroom Deputy. Plaintiff is warned that failure to serve summons and complaint on Defendants will result in a dismiss al of the action and/or a dismissal of that Defendant not properly served pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4. Plaintiff is further directed to file with the Clerk of Court, the appropriate returns of service and/or waiver of service. Plaintiff is further warned that failure to appear on a Court's noticed hearing may result in the dismissal of the action for want of prosecution pursuant to Local Rule 41.1. Mailed notice. [For further details see written opinion.] (ea, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
