Thul et al v. Onewest Bank, FSB d/b/a Indymac Mortgage Services
| Charles Thul and Cynthia Thul |
| Onewest Bank, FSB |
| 1:2012cv06380 |
| August 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Kane |
| Matthew F. Kennelly |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 1/18/2013: For the reasons stated in this decision, the Court vacates the previously entered order to show cause as to attorney Andrew Fuchs and declines to impose any further sanction upon attorneys John Beisner and Jessica Miller. (mk)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 1/2/2013: For the reasons the accompanying decision, the Court denies defendant's motion to dismiss [docket no. 29]. The Court also directs each of the attorneys who su bmitted the motion to dismiss and supporting briefs, John Beisner, Jessica Miller, and Andrew Fuchs of the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP, to show cause in writing, by no later than January 10, 2013, why they should not be sanc tioned in one or more of the ways described in the decision. The ruling date of January 3, 2013 is vacated. Thecase is set for a status hearing in open court on January 17, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. Mr. Beisner, Ms. Miller, and Mr. Fuchs are all directed to appear in person. (mk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
