Bank of Camden v. Village of West Dunee et al
||Bank of Camden
||Village of West Dunee and Springhill Gateway, LLC.
||August 21, 2012
||US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
||XX US, Outside the State of IL
||Rebecca R. Pallmeyer
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 11, 2017
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order:For the foregoing reasons, the Village Defendants' motion to dismiss, R. 111 , is granted, and Counts I, III, IV, and V are dismissed with prejudice. This is the fourth amended complaint, and the Court finds that a fifth bite at the apple would be futile.With regard to Count II, the Court granted a default judgment against the Springhill defendants on November 26, 2012. See R. 24. A hearing on the extent of damages was scheduled and postponed, and never rescheduled. FAST should contact the Court to schedule such a hearing if it is necessary. If FAST does not do so by February 13, 2017, the case will be closed. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 1/11/2017:Mailed notice(srn, )
|November 21, 2014
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated, the Court grants the Village's partial motion to dismiss Counts I, III, and IV of Plaintiffs' third amended complaint, excluding Count IV's request for declaratory judgment regarding payment of the Village's attorneys' fee, R. 66. The Bank is dismissed as a plaintiff for lack of standing. Status hearing set for 12/9/2014 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 11/21/2014:Mailed notice(srn, )
|August 12, 2013
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated above, the Village's motion to dismiss 13 is granted. If the Bank has some other theory as to how the Village is violating a requirement of the SSA Act or the Ordinance, it may seek leave to file an amended complaint on or before September 6, 2013. As it stands, the Bank has not stated a plausible claim that the Village is violating the SSA Act or the Ordinance. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 8/12/2013:(srn, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?