Arroyo v. Volvo Parts North America LLC
| Luzmaria Arroyo |
| Volvo Group North America, LLC |
| 1:2012cv06859 |
| August 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| John Z. Lee |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
351
MEMORANDUM OPINOIN AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 12/27/2022. Emailed notice(cdh, )
|
|
Filing
227
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on September 30, 2019: For the reasons stated above, Defendants motion for judgment as a matter of law, or, in the alternative, a new trial, or , in the alternative, remittitur and amendment of judgment 192 is granted to the following extent: the Court will enter judgment as a matter of law in favor of Defendant on Plaintiff's ADA discri mination claim and grant a new trial on Plaintiff's USERRA claim. Defendant's remaining requests for relief are denied. Plaintiff's motion to alter judgment 204 is denied in its entirety as moot. This case is set for further status hearing on October 10, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. Mailed notice(cdh, )
|
|
Filing
192
MOTION by Defendant Volvo Group North America, LLC for judgment DEFENDANT VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, LLCS MOTION FOR RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE A NEW TRIAL, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE REMITTITUR AND AMENDMENT OF JUDGMENT, NUNC PRO TUNC TO AUGUST 10, 2017 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Bassford Wilson, Susan)
|
|
Filing
177
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 7/13/2017. Mailed notice(cdh, )
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER: Plaintiff's motions in limine 1-4 126 and Defendant's motions in limine 1-5 124 are granted in part and denied in part. This case remains set for a final pretrial conference on 8/11/2016 at 2:00 p.m. See attached Statement for further details. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 8/4/2016. Mailed notice (ber, )
|
|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated, the Court grants Defendant's motion for summary judgment 75 . Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant Defendant Volvo Group North America, LLC and against Plaintiff LuzMaria Arroyo on all claims. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 9/30/2014. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arroyo v. Volvo Parts North America LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Luzmaria Arroyo | |
| Represented By: | Edward M. Fox |
| Represented By: | Jonathan R. Ksiazek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Volvo Group North America, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Susan E. Bassford Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
