Fuqua v. Donahoe et al
| Leonard D. Fuqua |
| Patrick Donahoe, John Potter, United States Postal Service, National Postal Mail Handlers Union, AFL-CIO and Jefferson Peppers |
| 1:2012cv06977 |
| August 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Suzanne B. Conlon |
| Labor/Management Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
169
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, the Postal Service's motion for summary judgment 156 is granted. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 9/30/2015:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
|
Filing
107
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order:For the foregoing reasons, the defendants' motions to dismiss [79, 81], are granted in part and denied in part. The Court grants the Postal Service's motions to dismiss Count III with prejudice as time-barred, but denies the Postal Service's motion to dismiss Count I. Fuqua may therefore proceed with his ADEA claim. Local 306's motion to dismiss is granted in its entirety, and Counts II, III, IV and V against Local 306 are dismissed with prejudice. National Postal Mail Handlers Union, AFL-CIO/Local 306 terminated. Status hearing set for 10/9/2013 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 9/25/2013:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
