Washington v. Sims et al
| Willie Washington |
| Kevin Sims, John Doe 1, Avary Hart, Chidinma Onyeachonam, John Doe and Paramedic Moore |
| 1:2012cv07099 |
| September 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Ronald A. Guzman |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 10/9/2012: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $5.22. The trust fund officer at Plaintiff&# 039;s place of confinement is authorized make deductions from Plaintiff's prison trust fund account in accordance with this order. The clerk shall send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at Cook County Jail. The clerk shall also is sue summons for Defendants R.N. Chidima Onyeachonam, Paramedic Moore, and Medical Director Dr. Avery Hart. The John Doe Defendants cannot be served until their identities are known. Kevin Sims is dismissed as Defendant. The clerk shall forward to Plaintiff a consent form to proceed before a Magistrate Judge and instructions as to how file documents in this case. Signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 10/9/2012:Mailed notice. [For further details see written opinion.](ea, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
