Atkocaitis v. Dart et al
| John Atkocaitis |
| Eileen Couture, David Carrington and Satinder Brar |
| 1:2012cv07264 |
| September 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Logan |
| Charles P. Kocoras |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 9/24/2012: The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted. The Court authorizes and orders the trust fund officer at the plaintiff's place of incar ceration to deduct $5.30 from the plaintiff's accountfor payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial filing fee, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this Order. On the Court's own motion, Thomas Dart, C ermak Health Services, James Cavanaugh, and the City of Chicago are dismissed as defendants on preliminary review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The Clerk is directed to: (1) send a copy of this Order to the trust fund officer at the Logan Corre ctional Center; (2) issue summonses for service on all other defendants by the U.S. Marshal; and (3) send the plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form and Instructions for Submitting Documents along with a copy of this Order. Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 9/24/2012: Mailed notice (For further details see opinion) (np, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
