Anderson v. Hardy et al
| George Ellis Anderson, Sr. |
| John Doe, Joe Encarnarcion, Marcus Hardy, Daryl Edwards, Charles Downs and Sgt. Mays |
| 1:2012cv07301 |
| September 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Will |
| Ruben Castillo |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Ruben Castillo on 9/19/2012:Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted. The Court authorizes and orders Stateville Correctional Center officials to deduct $5.61 from Plaintiff's account, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at Stateville Correctional Center. The Clerk shall: (1) issue summonses for servi ce of the complaint on the Defendants and (2) attach a Magistrate Judge Consent Form to the summonses for Defendants. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 4 is granted. The Court appoints Lisa Ann Iverson of Neal and McDevitt, 1776 Ash Street, Northfield, Illinois, 60093, (847) 441-9100, to represent Plaintiff in accordance with counsel's trial bar obligations under the District Courts Local Rule 83.37. [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (tg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
