Video and Sound Service, Inc. v. AMAG Technology, Inc. et al
Video and Sound Service, Inc. |
AMAG Technology, Inc. and Intransa, Inc. |
1:2012cv07322 |
September 13, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
James F. Holderman |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 MOTION by Plaintiff Video and Sound Service, Inc. for judgment Against Intransa Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Flynn, Jodi) |
Filing 39 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Intransa, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss/Transfer 14 is denied, and this case shall remain in the Northern District of Illinois for all further proceedings. Intransa's answer is due on or before 4/26/13. Counsel ar e requested to meet pursuant to Rule 26(f) and jointly file a Form 52 on or before 5/3/13. This case is set for a report on status and entry of a scheduling order on 5/9/13 at 9:00 a.m. Previously-dismissed defendant AMAG's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction 6 is denied as moot. The remaining parties are encouraged to discuss settlement. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 4/12/2013. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, ) |
Filing 33 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 12/19/12. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.