Thomas v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
| Jack Thomas |
| Asset Acceptance, LLC |
| 1:2012cv07360 |
| September 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Harry D. Leinenweber |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
OPINION and Order. Thomas's motion is granted. Thomas is granted leave (i) to depose Meghan Emmerich, or any other employee of the Sherman entities or Asset Acceptance with knowledge of the chain of title and supporting documents related to the transfer of his account; and (ii) to depose a person (or persons) knowledgeable about the circumstances surrounding the drafting of the "Declaration of Account Transfer," the "Abstract," and any of the other documents attached to Assets renewed motion to compel arbitration. The depositions shall be completed by June 2, 2014. Signed by the Honorable Andrea R. Wood on 4/7/2014Mailed notice(ntf, )
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated, Asset's motion to dismiss 50 is denied without prejudice. The status conference set for September 11, 2013 will remain, at which time the parties can inform the Court as to how they wish to proceed. (see order for further detail) Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 8/27/2013:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
