Dyson v. Village od Midlothian
| Terry Dyson |
| Village od Midlothian |
| 1:2012cv07632 |
| September 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| John A. Nordberg |
| P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
153
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 3/16/2016: For the reasons stated herein, Defendant Anthony Valente's motion in limine 4 to bar allegations of or testimony regarding selective enforcement or racial animus [Dkt. # 141] is taken under advisement pending a submission as detailed herein. Mailed notice (cjg, )
|
|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 6/13/2014: For the reasons set forth above, the Court grants in part and denies in part defendants' motion to dismiss the third amended complaint 80 . The motion is granted as to the claims in Counts III and IV, which are dismissed with prejudice. The motion is denied as to the claims asserted in Counts I and II, which are the only claims that remain in this suit. Status hearing is set for July 2, 2014. Mailed notice (cjg, )
|
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 2/14/2014: Plaintiff sues defendants, the Village of Midlothian and three of its police officers, Anthony Valente, David Burke and Steve Zamiar, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §&# 167; 1983 and 1985 for violating and conspiring to violate his constitutional rights. Defendants have filed a motion pursuant to FederalRule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss plaintiff's second amended complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion. Mailed notice (cjg, )
|
|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 10/11/2013: For the reasons set forth above, the Court grants the defendants' motion to dismiss 32 and dismisses without prejudice any individual capacity § 1983 claim plaintiff asserts against defendants Burke and Zamiar and the Monell claim he asserts against Burke and Zamiar in their official capacities and the Village of Midlothian in Count III of the amended complaint. Plaintiff has fourteen days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint that comports with this Order. If he fails to do so in that time, the Court will dismiss these claims with prejudice. Mailed notice (cjg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dyson v. Village od Midlothian | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Terry Dyson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Village od Midlothian | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
