Ghiles v. City of Chicago Heights et al
| Sebastian C. Ghiles |
| City of Chicago Heights and Jessica Garner |
| 1:2012cv07634 |
| September 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Milton I. Shadur |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 3/19/2018: Defendant's motion for summary judgment 99 is granted in part. Enter judgment and terminate civil case. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed. (psm, )
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 2/12/2016: Defendants' partial motion to dismiss and to strike, 46 , is granted in part, and denied in part as moot. The first-amendment retaliation and conspiracy counts (Counts I, VIIX) are dismissed without prejudice. Ghiles's requests for punitive damages and attorney fees are stricken from his tortious interference claim (Count X). The motion to strike punitive damages and attorney fee requests from Ghiles's conspiracy counts is moot; the conspiracy counts are dismissed in the entirety. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (psm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
